May performance and newsletter
On the trading side there wasn’t a lot to note. As a potential consequence of the continued SEC clampdown on crypto exchanges, the CME becomes the venue to where institutional money prefers to hold crypto exposure. With yields not insignificant, the carry cost may become a factor.
March performance and newsletter
A similar trading environment to February as market participants that left the market post FTX are slow in returning. This increased illiquidity is generally a positive for the DAFM strategy and we’d be happy for it to persist. The main opportunities we see remain in the CME vs crypto native exchanges where different types of market participants reside. Institutional vs retail predominantly. Development work continues, we aim to integrate stablecoin denominated and margined futures into the trading system in the coming months
February performance and newsletter
We saw similar market conditions to January as the fallout from the FTX implosion continues to wash through the industry. Leverage continued to return the market, observed via higher implied yields in the futures and perpetuals, as they rose to levels we hadn’t seen since the middle of 2022. Higher implied yields are the best marker for profitability of our strategy. Trading spreads stayed relatively wide and liquidity still hasn’t meaningfully returned. We continued to observe institutional funds coming back into the market via the CME. We maintained tight control on individual capital quotas at exchanges, keeping no more than 12.5% at any exchange during the period.
January performance and newsletter
Leverage crept back into the market with the move higher in spot. We saw this in both futures and perpetual yields across all the instruments we trade. This was coupled with wider spreads and thinner liquidity as market participants withdrew post FTX to provide the most fertile trading environment for our strategy since 2021. Notably, we saw significant interest in the CME, where we observed a marked shift in positioning from institutional money as they cut shorts and turned long for the first time since mid 2022. We maintained tight control on individual capital quotas at exchanges, keeping no more than 10% at any exchange during the period. We note that there’s been a distinct change in sentiment from crypto native exchanges post FTX, where there’s a much higher degree of transparency around assets held on exchange, and also in exploring novel methods for removing counterparty exchange risk by holding client assets in third party and escrow accounts. Something we wholeheartedly embrace.
October performance and newsletter
October was a particularly uneventful trading month, in hindsight, the lull before the storm. Spreads to the spot price, and the volatility of those spreads remained in tight ranges, providing a barren landscape of trading opportunities. For the first time in crypto’s history there was more volatility in traditional markets than crypto, with USD interest rates the main driver in the traditional markets.
November performance and newsletter
A quiet start to the month, which was then dominated by the collapse of FTX. Unfortunately related to this was the destruction in value of exchange coins that we held in order to qualify for reduced trading fees, causing further fund underperformance. The post FTX crypto landscape provided a fertile trading environment, with high volatility across venues. In the week after the collapse the principal driver of profitability was the large and volatile spreads between the CME and crypto native exchanges. As the opportunities of the CME against crypto exchanges waned, we saw other opportunities between crypto native exchanges as they took turns in trading more expensively relative to each other.
December performance and newsletter
The FTX bankruptcy created the most illiquid market environment we’ve seen all year, as market makers stepped back from derivative markets and counterparty credit risk was at the front of everyone’s mind. The paradox was that volatility remained relatively muted. DAFM implemented tight controls on outright exposure that we’d run in crypto native exchanges as we monitored the observable inflows/outflows. This inhibited our trading activity at times, particularly in Binance, but we were still able to take advantage of opportunities that these markets presented to post a solid monthly return.
September performance and newsletter
The Ethereum Merge provided a complex trading environment with very little certainty around how the “Forked” Proof of Work token would be created and how it would trade once implemented. Additionally, there was ongoing conjecture around whether the Merge may get delayed all adding to a difficult market to price dated Futures dependent on that information. Bitcoin was largely sidelined during the month with little interest on either side and no leverage to speak of coming into the market. This manifested in a very flat and stable Forward curve. Not an ideal market environment for our strategy.
August performance and newsletter
It’s all about the Merge and our positioning around this to ensure no surprises from the myriad of complex instruments that we trade, whilst simultaneously trying to take advantage of this event. The expected PoW token drop on the split from PoS has created distortions in the markets, resulting in yields of greater than negative 100% APY in the short term.
July performance and newsletter
It was a month where the Crypto markets seemed to take a breath after the tumultuous events of June. Crypto Markets rallied overall but there was little conviction in most participants and that kept leverage/yields muted, and thus trading opportunities limited. The announcement of the Ethereum Merge date came into focus and the staking rewards on offer in ETH 2.0 has been another factor depressing yields.